Performance Review Policy

SCOPE

Pastors and staff who are not meeting required standards will have these issues addressed as soon as performance difficulties are identified. Generally, unsatisfactory performance means not meeting agreed ministry objectives, pastoral care standards, administrative tasks, timeframes, or quality of work. Agreed standards are communicated through position descriptions, ministry plans, termly catch ups, annual goals, or other formal documentation.

Dealing with unsatisfactory performance requires a staged process which is transparent, consistently applied, considers the unique nature of ministry work, and has regard to any personal circumstances of the staff member. Restoration and improvement of performance is the primary goal, reflecting our Christian values of grace, growth, and reconciliation.

This procedure applies to all church staff where performance issues are identified, including:

BIBLICAL FOUNDATION

This procedure is grounded in biblical principles of:

PROCEDURAL STEPS

Responding to Unsatisfactory Performance

The key stages for addressing unsatisfactory performance are:

Pastoral and Operational Management

Where there is an incident or general level of substandard performance involving a specific staff member that requires action, the relevant supervisor (Senior Pastor, Campus Pastor, or designated ministry leader) will:

Initial Response:

The supervisor will:

Documentation: A written record will be kept of the content and outcomes of any meeting by the supervisor, with a copy presented to the staff member. These records will be kept confidential unless the matter escalates. All documentation will be handled with sensitivity to the pastoral nature of church ministry.

Immediate Action Required: Unsatisfactory performance should be addressed by supervisors as soon as it is identified, balanced with pastoral sensitivity. The nature of the unsatisfactory performance should be clearly communicated with specific examples and biblical guidance where appropriate.

Supportive Strategies: The following strategies can be implemented for unsatisfactory performance:

STAGE 1 – IMPROVEMENT UNDER PASTORAL SUPERVISION

If informal support and meetings fail to improve performance, a formal response will be required. This stage maintains a pastoral approach while establishing clear expectations.

Formal Meeting Requirements: A meeting must be held to outline concerns, including:

Supervision and Documentation:

Improvement Plan Implementation: This stage involves implementing a written improvement plan that includes:

Formal Documentation: A performance support letter outlining the concerns, agreed actions, timeframes, and outcomes will be prepared by the supervisor and provided to the staff member. This letter will include:

A copy should be provided to the Executive Team  and kept in the staff member's confidential personnel file.

Ongoing Support:

STAGE 2 – FORMAL MEETING WITH EXECUTIVE TEAM

Notification: A letter outlining the progression to Stage 2 will be prepared by the supervisor and provided to the staff member. This letter will include:

Meeting Participants: The supervisor will arrange a meeting including:

Meeting Process:

STAGE 3 – DISCIPLINARY ACTION (SENIOR PASTOR)

If the staff member has been given reasonable opportunity to improve performance through Stages 1 and 2 but has not demonstrated sufficient improvement, disciplinary action may be necessary.

Decision Process: This decision should be made in consultation between supervisors and the Senior Pastor (or Church Board for senior pastoral positions). The decision process must include:

Disciplinary Action Options:

Procedural Fairness: Principles of procedural fairness will be applied, ensuring:

Formal Notification: The Senior Pastor will advise the staff member in writing that performance remains unsatisfactory and may lead to disciplinary action. The notification will include:

Decision Considerations: The following factors will be considered:

Final Decision Documentation: In matters where disciplinary action is taken, the Senior Pastor will write to the staff member including:

DEALING WITH UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE - FLOWCHART

Stage

Evidence Required

Person Responsible

Initial Identification

Performance concerns noted through supervision, feedback, or observation

Immediate Supervisor

Informal Support

Documentation of conversations and support offered

Supervisor

Stage 1: Improvement Plan

Written improvement plan, meeting records, progress documentation

Supervisor (Senior Pastor informed)

Stage 2: Formal Meeting

Stage 1 documentation, formal meeting minutes, updated improvement plan

Supervisor + Senior Pastor

Stage 3: Disciplinary Action

Complete documentation from all stages, decision rationale, final communications

Senior Pastor (Board consultation for senior roles)

Process Flow:

  1. Staff member identified as experiencing performance difficulties

  2. Informal support and mentoring provided

  3. Assessment: Improvement achieved? → Yes: Continue monitoring → No: Progress to Stage 1

  4. Formal improvement program implemented under pastoral supervision

  5. Assessment: Required performance met? → Yes: Case closed with continued support → No: Progress to Stage 2

  6. Formal meeting with senior leadership

  7. Assessment: Satisfactory improvement? → Yes: Case reviewed and closed → No: Referred to Senior Pastor for disciplinary decision

  8. Senior Pastor makes final decision with appropriate consultation

  9. All outcomes communicated with pastoral care and support

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR CHURCH MINISTRY

Pastoral Staff Considerations

Confidentiality and Church Community

Restoration Focus


Revision #4
Created 12 November 2025 10:57:08 by Tash Eagle
Updated 12 November 2025 11:02:09 by Tash Eagle